Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 17:30:08 +0900
From: $BHxC+>;B'(B <masa.odani@gmail.com>
Subject: [PSJ-News:00373] $B!Z%j%^%$%s%@!
To: psj-news <psj-news@pragmatics.gr.jp>
Message-Id: <CAGLeuOag_xt8J3ttZCm0JgE9U0u4CN+AY=f+-v_ef7n--Y6dRA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00373

$BF|K\8lMQO@3X2q2q0w$N$_$J$5$^!J=EJ#$7$Fl9g$4MFe$2$^$9!#(B
$B?=$79~$_ITMW!&<+M3;22C$G$9$N$GJ3$C$F$4;22C$/$@$5$$!#(B

$BC]ED$i$i(B
$BEl5~EE5!Bg3X(B

$B!=!=5-!=!=(B

2018$BG/EY(B $BBh0l2s(BJACET$BCLOC9TF08&5f2q(B

$BF|;~!'(B2018$BG/(B5$B7n(B18$BF|!J6b!K(B 18:00?19:30
$B9V;U!'(BProf Cornelia Ilie (Str$(D+S(Bmstad Academy, Sweden)
$BBjL\!'(BPower and gendering in parliament: Sexist and abusive language in the UK
Parliament
$B>l=j!'Aa0pEDBg3X(B $BAa0pED%-%c%s%Q%9(B 11$B9f4[(B702$B65<<(B

$B%"%/%;%9!&%-%c%s%Q%9%^%C%W(B
https://www.waseda.jp/top/access/waseda-campus

$BLd$$9g$o$;@h!'2#IM;TN)Bg3X(B $BEZ207D;R(B
$B!v;vA0M=LsITMW!&3X@8$N;22C4?7^(B

<ABSTRACT>
After a record number of women were elected to the House of Commons in
1997, many incidents of sexism and abusive behaviour were reported. The aim
of this lecture is twofold: on the one hand, to scrutinize the mechanisms
and effects of sexist discrimination and stereotyping of women MPs in the
House of Commons (Puwar 2000; Ilie 2013); on the other hand, to identify
the strategies used by female (and male) MPs to subvert discriminatory
representations, and to counteract gender-biased and sexist treatment. The
focus of the multi-level analysis is on three recurrent strategies:
objectifying women MPs through fixation on personal appearance rather than
professional performance (e.g. making trivialising comments about women$B!G(Bs
hair and dressing style); patronizing women MPs through the use of
derogatory forms of address (e.g. directly addressing them by the terms of
endearment $B!H(Bhoney$B!I(B, $B!H(Bdear$B!I(B, $B!H(Bwoman$B!I(B); stigmatizing women MPs through
abusive and discriminatory labell!
 ing (e.g. ascribing to them stereotypically insulting names). The findings
of this investigation show that there is growing need for substantive
change of the parliamentary culture of abusive behaviour and sexism,
especially during PMQs, which can only be brought about by means of
concerted institutional and behavioural normative reform, as well as by
parliamentary culture $B!F(Bregendering$B!G(B (Sones et al. 2005).

<BIO DATA>
Cornelia Ilie is Professor of Linguistics and Rhetoric at Str$(D+S(Bmstad
Academy, Sweden. She was research fellow at Lancaster University, UK,
research scholar at U.C. Berkeley, and held visiting professorships at
universities in Austria, Finland, Greece, Italy, Romania, Spain, and the
UK. She is the founder and president of ESTIDIA (European Society for
Transcultural and Interdisciplinary Dialogue), and IPrA Board member. Prof.
Ilie has published extensively on institutional discourse practices,
intercultural rhetoric and argumentation. Her recent publications include:
International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction
(Wiley-Blackwell, 2015); Argumentation across communities of practice:
Multi-disciplinary perspectives (J.Benjamins 2017); Challenging leadership
stereotypes through discourse: Power, management and gender (Springer 2017).
	
373_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)